From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752852Ab1JXWc1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:32:27 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:33110 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752318Ab1JXWc0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:32:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:32:24 +0200 From: Mark Brown To: Grant Likely Cc: Yoshinori Sato , Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] h8300: Move gpio.h to gpio-internal.h Message-ID: <20111024223223.GA4351@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1319493561-4094-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20111024221004.GE4394@ponder.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111024221004.GE4394@ponder.secretlab.ca> X-Cookie: You will be awarded some great honor. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:10:04AM +0200, Grant Likely wrote: > This of course should go via the h8300 tree instead of the gpio tree. If you look at the commit history there's not been much h8300 specific work going on for quite some time now - all the commits have been going via other trees - so since it's basically a gpiolib cleanup I figure it'd be less work for Sato-san if you were able to pick it up.