From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add a reg-names property to name reg entries Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20111025082632.GJ4429@atomide.com> References: <1319471697-8970-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:57418 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998Ab1JYI0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:26:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1319471697-8970-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Cousson Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Benoit Cousson [111024 17:20]: > + compatible = "ti,mcasp"; > + reg = <0 0x10 0x10>, <0 0x20 0x10>, > + <1 0x10 0x10>, <1 0x20 0x10>; > + reg-names = "mpu", "dat", > + "dma", "dma_dat"; Hmm for some systems looks like this can also solve how to pass the mux signal names cleanly from DT. For some systems we may also need reg-bits in addition to reg-names to describe the signal names. Or do we already have something for that? Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:26:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] of: Add a reg-names property to name reg entries In-Reply-To: <1319471697-8970-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> References: <1319471697-8970-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> Message-ID: <20111025082632.GJ4429@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Benoit Cousson [111024 17:20]: > + compatible = "ti,mcasp"; > + reg = <0 0x10 0x10>, <0 0x20 0x10>, > + <1 0x10 0x10>, <1 0x20 0x10>; > + reg-names = "mpu", "dat", > + "dma", "dma_dat"; Hmm for some systems looks like this can also solve how to pass the mux signal names cleanly from DT. For some systems we may also need reg-bits in addition to reg-names to describe the signal names. Or do we already have something for that? Tony