From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:31:57 +0200 Subject: GIC MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER branches In-Reply-To: <20111025082855.GB9290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20111024162612.728acd58@taxman.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> <20111025074815.GG4429@atomide.com> <20111025082855.GB9290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111025083157.GK4429@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [111025 09:54]: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:48:16AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Marc Zyngier [111024 16:59]: > > > I've stashed my patches for MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER on the following branches: > > > git://github.com/mzyngier/arm-platforms.git gic-multi-irq > > > git://github.com/mzyngier/arm-platforms.git gic-multi-irq-asm > > > > > > This is based on Russell's smp branch, plus my PPI patches that Russell > > > has already pulled for the upcoming merge window. > > > > > > The difference between the two branches is that the second is keeping > > > the ASM version of the GIC handler instead of a C version. > > > > > > The C version has been tested on VE, Realview, Tegra, and OMAP2/3/4. > > > The ASM version has only been tested on OMAP4. > > > > For the record, boots fine on omap1/2/3/4 like I replied earlier > > with my Tested-by. > > > > Can people please test this series on all subarchs so Marc can > > then remove the remaining assembly code too. > > My feeling is that this is too disruptive to take for 3.2 now that the > merge window is open: just adding Marc's PPI patches on Sunday caused > a number of _horrible_ conflicts crop up. This probably is no > different. > > So, let's postpone this kind of stuff until after this merge window has > closed. OK, I was hoping we could get it in without the assembly changes.. > (BTW, Linus won't be pulling major stuff which hasn't been in linux-next - > see the 3.1 announcement.) ..but yeah I guess it's too late now. Tony