From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 17 of 24] libxl: add libxl__spawn_confirm_offspring_startup Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:21:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20111025172159.GA11571@aepfle.de> References: <018f63b6e4863faca16a.1317657294@probook.site> <20134.54883.620815.989672@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20134.54883.620815.989672@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Oct 25, Ian Jackson wrote: > Olaf Hering writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 17 of 24] libxl: add libxl__spawn_confirm_offspring_startup"): > > libxl: add libxl__spawn_confirm_offspring_startup > > > > libxl__spawn_confirm_offspring_startup() is a generic version of > > libxl__confirm_device_model_startup(). > > Thanks but I think it would be better to refactor this to avoid the > duplication of this code. The new function is used in patch #18 of this series. Or do you have some other changes in mind? Olaf