Re: [GIT PATCH] big staging merge for 3.2

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is the big staging merge for 3.2
> >
> > Note, I ended up merging this with your 3.1 release to resolve a merge
> > issue with one of the comedi drivers to fix a build issue.  If you want
> > me to redo the tree without this merge, I'll be glad to do so and let
> > you do it :)
> 
> I don't hate merges that make sense, and that one looks fine. You
> picked a logical merge point, and you wrote a merge message that
> explains it. No problem.
> 
> > There's a lot of patches in here, and the overall diff is quite
> > impressive:
> >  834 files changed, 103718 insertions(+), 230262 deletions(-)
> 
> Hmm... I only get
> 
>  725 files changed, 103936 insertions(+), 180480 deletions(-)
> 
> Which is still good, but nothing like your numbers. Where did you find
> the extra 50k lines?

I don't know, I took it straight from git.

I did a:
	git diff -M --stat --summary master..HEAD

And in that tree master was v3.1 and HEAD was 43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958
so if you do:
	git diff -M --stat --summary v3.1..43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958

in your tree, I also get the above diffstat:

$ git diff -M --stat --summary v3.1..43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958 | grep insert
 834 files changed, 103718 insertions(+), 230262 deletions(-)

Did I do that wrong?  There are a lot of renames, is my default value
for git different than what you might have on your box?  Or am I diffing
the wrong thing here?

thanks,

greg k-h