From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:47378 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932178Ab1J2JkS (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 05:40:18 -0400 Received: by faan17 with SMTP id n17so4263910faa.19 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:40:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Lamparter To: Thomas Pedersen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: QoS multicast frames have No Ack policy Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:40:11 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.open80211s.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com References: <1319864732-11286-1-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> <1319864732-11286-2-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> In-Reply-To: <1319864732-11286-2-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <201110291140.12311.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20111029_114022_477911_33A48182) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 29 October 2011 07:05:30 Thomas Pedersen wrote: > Previously QoS multicast frames had the Normal Acknowledgment QoS > control bits set. This would cause broadcast frames to be discarded by > peers with which we have a BA session, since their sequence number would > fall outside the allowed range. Set No Ack QoS control bits on multicast > QoS frames and filter these in de-aggregation code. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen > --- > net/mac80211/rx.c | 8 +++++++- > net/mac80211/wme.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c > index b867bd5..ee9e71b 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c > @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx) > struct sta_info *sta = rx->sta; > struct tid_ampdu_rx *tid_agg_rx; > u16 sc; > - int tid; > + u8 tid, ack_policy; > > if (!ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control)) > goto dont_reorder; > @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx) > if (!sta) > goto dont_reorder; > > + ack_policy = *ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr) & ~IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK; uh, while it might be a bit far fetched, but ack_policy might now clash with frames that have set: IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_EOSP (0x10) IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_A_MSDU_PRESENT (0x80) IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_MESH_CONTROL_PRESENT (0x100) so I think we would be better of with something like: (in include/linux/ieee80211.h) #define IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_ACK_POLICY_MASK 0x0060 ack_policy = *ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr) & ~IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_ACK_POLICY_MASK; > @@ -770,6 +771,11 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx) > if (unlikely(hdr->frame_control & cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_STYPE_NULLFUNC))) > goto dont_reorder; > > + /* not part of a BA session */ > + if (!((ack_policy == IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_ACK_POLICY_BLOCKACK) || > + (ack_policy == IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_ACK_POLICY_NORMAL))) > + goto dont_reorder; > + Regards, Chr