From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:58:48 +0100 References: <4EAC49D7.2060609@intra2net.com> <1319988163-3249-1-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> In-Reply-To: <1319988163-3249-1-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110302158.48772.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Fix range check for expected packets Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Wunderlich On Sunday, October 30, 2011 16:22:43 Simon Wunderlich wrote: > The check for new packets in the future used a wrong binary operator, > which makes the check expression always true and accepting too many > packets. Applied in revision 00ca20e. Thanks, Marek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Fix range check for expected packets Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:58:48 +0100 Message-ID: <201110302158.48772.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> References: <4EAC49D7.2060609@intra2net.com> <1319988163-3249-1-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Simon Wunderlich To: b.a.t.m.a.n-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1319988163-3249-1-git-send-email-siwu-MaAgPAbsBIVS8oHt8HbXEIQuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Errors-To: b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sunday, October 30, 2011 16:22:43 Simon Wunderlich wrote: > The check for new packets in the future used a wrong binary operator, > which makes the check expression always true and accepting too many > packets. Applied in revision 00ca20e. Thanks, Marek