diff for duplicates of <20111101123608.GD25123@suse.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 4c57dcb..130b930 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:22:14AM -0700, Colin Cross wrote: > >> > even though they may not pass it. > >> > >> Only before interrupts are enabled, and then isn't it vulnerable to -> >> the same livelock? Interrupts are off, single cpu, kswapd can't run. +> >> the same livelock? Interrupts are off, single cpu, kswapd can't run. > >> If an allocation ever failed, which seems unlikely, why would retrying > >> help? > >> > > > > If you want to claim gfp_allowed_mask as a pm-only entity, then I see no -> > problem with this approach. However, if gfp_allowed_mask would be allowed +> > problem with this approach. However, if gfp_allowed_mask would be allowed > > to temporarily change after init for another purpose then it would make > > sense to retry because another allocation with __GFP_FS on another cpu or > > kswapd could start making progress could allow for future memory freeing. @@ -48,3 +48,10 @@ pm_suspending. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs + +-- +To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in +the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, +see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . +Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ +Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 683527a..7172cd9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ "> >> > even though they may not pass it.\n" "> >>\n" "> >> Only before interrupts are enabled, and then isn't it vulnerable to\n" - "> >> the same livelock? \302\240Interrupts are off, single cpu, kswapd can't run.\n" + "> >> the same livelock? Interrupts are off, single cpu, kswapd can't run.\n" "> >> If an allocation ever failed, which seems unlikely, why would retrying\n" "> >> help?\n" "> >>\n" "> >\n" "> > If you want to claim gfp_allowed_mask as a pm-only entity, then I see no\n" - "> > problem with this approach. \302\240However, if gfp_allowed_mask would be allowed\n" + "> > problem with this approach. However, if gfp_allowed_mask would be allowed\n" "> > to temporarily change after init for another purpose then it would make\n" "> > sense to retry because another allocation with __GFP_FS on another cpu or\n" "> > kswapd could start making progress could allow for future memory freeing.\n" @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ "\n" "-- \n" "Mel Gorman\n" - SUSE Labs + "SUSE Labs\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" + "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" + "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" + "Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/\n" + "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" -50d36c28321f3fef394921f29ab25ec84cb1c90b6759c7098e0668806e2acb83 +a85f2ee8e1832915698bc05d25a1b9d1f6bc4b740d73b662bb96c3edd07ea177
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.