From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] acpi: add ssdt for cpi hotplug Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:33:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20111103123330.GJ18296@redhat.com> References: <20111101191139.GA18317@redhat.com> <20111101225901.GB31374@morn.localdomain> <20111102085442.GF5613@redhat.com> <20111103003028.GA16459@morn.localdomain> <4EB1E8B9.7050408@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111103013658.GA19883@morn.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: seabios@seabios.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: "Kevin O'Connor" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111103013658.GA19883@morn.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: seabios-bounces+gcbcs-seabios=m.gmane.org@seabios.org Sender: seabios-bounces+gcbcs-seabios=m.gmane.org@seabios.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:36:58PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:04:57AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: > > At 11/03/2011 08:30 AM, Kevin O'Connor Write: > > > I think it's reasonable to require that a user supplied DSDT still > > > fill certain requirements. Keep in mind that the reason for the "user > > > supplied" DSDT was for new platform (q35) development - not > > > necessarily so each individual user could set their own. > > > > I do not think it's reasonable to require that a user supplied DSDT still > > fill certain requiements. > > Please elaborate on why. > > The dependency on the DSDT is a few methods (PCEJ, CPEJ, CPST, CPMA). The one that seems unavoidable is PCI0. -- MST