From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:14:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111104131436.GN1512@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLGf78q7rR7-q4d6TizmghFcKyK3tFOAew4i2-SHrZcvhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> We are reusing kernel code and headers and I am not interested in
> copying them over. Living in the kernel tree is part of the design,
> whether you like it or not.
Besides that the KVM tool with its small and clean code-base is a really
nice reference on how to use the KVM kernel interface for anyone willing
to implement its own user-space. As a developer you can learn a lot more
from it as by reading the files on Documentation/. So I think it should
definitly be part of the kernel source tree.
Whether it lives in tools/ or Documentation/ ... I don't care. In tools/
is certainly better for all the developers already using the it for
testing their kernels.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 8:38 [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2 Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 12:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 12:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 13:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 14:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 15:16 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 16:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 17:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-04 16:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 17:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:14 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-11-04 14:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-08 14:44 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-08 15:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-08 16:00 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-10 3:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 6:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 7:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:23 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:14 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:49 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 13:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 13:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 14:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 15:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111104131436.GN1512@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.