From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: USB support for device tree Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:43:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20111104154356.GA30439@kroah.com> References: <4EB3A165.8060300@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB3A165.8060300-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pavan Kondeti Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, "linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:09PM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote: > Hi > > I am working on adding USB device tree support for MSM platform. One of > our chip set has 2 hsusb cores. The first core is configured as otg and > the other core is configured in host only mode (EHCI compliant). Are the > below device node names Okay? Please suggest. Why do you need to name the speed of the device and the host? That doesn't really matter if you plug a low-speed device into that super speed host controller, right? I'm not familiar with device tree naming conventions, but is this something you do for network devices? If not, I'd not recommend it for USB controllers either. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html