From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Subject: suspicious RCU usage in security/selinux/netport.c:127
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:25:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111107162531.GA28795@redhat.com> (raw)
I think I reported this a while ago. Turns out it's still a problem.
This patch I think made the warning go away, but it might be a bit too 'big hammer' ?
Dave
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
-------------------------------
security/selinux/netport.c:127 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
1 lock held by named/1687:
#0: (sel_netport_lock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff812e3799>] sel_netport_sid+0xd9/0x260
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1687, comm: named Not tainted 3.1.0+ #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810bcc37>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd7/0xe0
[<ffffffff812e3917>] sel_netport_sid+0x257/0x260
[<ffffffff812e36c0>] ? sel_netport_find+0xe0/0xe0
[<ffffffff812dd8ba>] selinux_socket_bind+0x22a/0x300
[<ffffffff8116ceb3>] ? might_fault+0x53/0xb0
[<ffffffff8116cefc>] ? might_fault+0x9c/0xb0
[<ffffffff8116ceb3>] ? might_fault+0x53/0xb0
[<ffffffff812d3fb6>] security_socket_bind+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff81539b4a>] sys_bind+0x7a/0x100
[<ffffffff816572ba>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
[<ffffffff810c18dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11d/0x1b0
[<ffffffff8133c65e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff81657282>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
diff --git a/security/selinux/netport.c b/security/selinux/netport.c
index 0b62bd1..69f6928 100644
--- a/security/selinux/netport.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netport.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static void sel_netport_insert(struct sel_netport *port)
/* we need to impose a limit on the growth of the hash table so check
* this bucket to make sure it is within the specified bounds */
idx = sel_netport_hashfn(port->psec.port);
+ rcu_read_lock();
list_add_rcu(&port->list, &sel_netport_hash[idx].list);
if (sel_netport_hash[idx].size == SEL_NETPORT_HASH_BKT_LIMIT) {
struct sel_netport *tail;
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ static void sel_netport_insert(struct sel_netport *port)
kfree_rcu(tail, rcu);
} else
sel_netport_hash[idx].size++;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/**
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-07 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 16:25 Dave Jones [this message]
2011-11-07 16:29 ` suspicious RCU usage in security/selinux/netport.c:127 Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111107162531.GA28795@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.