diff for duplicates of <20111108170446.GA17399@infradead.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 75ce916..8021052 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,8 +4,3 @@ On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
 
 Btw, one useful thing for these patches would be to clearly error
 out if fsstress does't recognize the option.
-
-_______________________________________________
-xfs mailing list
-xfs@oss.sgi.com
-http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index bdafc4e..a96dd68 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:04:46 -0500\0"
  "To\0Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>\0"
- "Cc\0tytso@mit.edu"
-  xfs@oss.sgi.com
-  dave@jikos.cz
-  aelder@sgi.com
+ "Cc\0dave@jikos.cz"
   linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
- " hch@lst.de\0"
+  aelder@sgi.com
+  tytso@mit.edu
+  hch@lst.de
+ " xfs@oss.sgi.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:\n"
@@ -19,11 +19,6 @@
  "> test explicitly want use new feature \"-f setattr=1\"\n"
  "\n"
  "Btw, one useful thing for these patches would be to clearly error\n"
- "out if fsstress does't recognize the option.\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "xfs mailing list\n"
- "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
- http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
+ out if fsstress does't recognize the option.
 
-b27a3d58a8f0209123a75eb1ab5f2275da103098d83df62e5227bc91ea253a68
+8448143836c922f99c59656bc02f075c55b0d38566554849b90f2876acbe1d24
