diff for duplicates of <20111108182728.GR4954@shiny> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2729178..725275c 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,27 +1,21 @@ On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote: -> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> = -wrote: +> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > -> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of = -long -> > running projects and cleanup queues. =A0I've got btrfs patches in t= -he new -> > kernel.org btrfs repo. =A0There are two different branches with the= - same -> > changes. =A0for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested again= -st +> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long +> > running projects and cleanup queues. I've got btrfs patches in the new +> > kernel.org btrfs repo. There are two different branches with the same +> > changes. for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against > > Linus' tree as of yesterday. ->=20 +> > [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2 > [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed ->=20 +> > FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that > whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again. Format change in 3.2 or > 32/64 bit compatibility issues? -I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 an= -d +I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 and 3.1 code before releasing. I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit. Are there any other messages in dmesg? Could you please see what diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 6dc19a0..abb3ab9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -10,29 +10,23 @@ "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote:\n" - "> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> =\n" - "wrote:\n" + "> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:\n" "> > Hi everyone,\n" "> >\n" - "> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of =\n" - "long\n" - "> > running projects and cleanup queues. =A0I've got btrfs patches in t=\n" - "he new\n" - "> > kernel.org btrfs repo. =A0There are two different branches with the=\n" - " same\n" - "> > changes. =A0for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested again=\n" - "st\n" + "> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long\n" + "> > running projects and cleanup queues. \302\240I've got btrfs patches in the new\n" + "> > kernel.org btrfs repo. \302\240There are two different branches with the same\n" + "> > changes. \302\240for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against\n" "> > Linus' tree as of yesterday.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2\n" "> [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that\n" "> whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again. Format change in 3.2 or\n" "> 32/64 bit compatibility issues?\n" "\n" - "I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 an=\n" - "d\n" + "I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 and\n" "3.1 code before releasing. I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit.\n" "\n" "Are there any other messages in dmesg? Could you please see what\n" @@ -40,4 +34,4 @@ "\n" -chris -beb1e27e4d1ac891163b5191ff63fa287f364ce1f710a8cd49aef3a3b64ae01c +f7469a9da6e8d7eac63c5d60fecacab37dbde1240e41904b4daeea5ebddfd859
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.