From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Slusarz Subject: Re: [PATCH] add missing return in nv50_accel_init failure path Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 22:38:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20111109213844.GC3402@joi.lan> References: <1320607930-21794-6-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1320607930-21794-6-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Errors-To: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org To: Ben Skeggs Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:32:08PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > (...) I see my last kernel patches were already applied (with an exception of different fix to nv10 problem and vram-limit/debugging patch). Thanks. What about these 3 ddx patches? Any comments? Marcin