From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:38:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:58397 "EHLO linux-mips.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
        id S1903966Ab1KKNif (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
        Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:38:35 +0100
Received: from duck.linux-mips.net (duck.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1])
        by duck.linux-mips.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pABDcYXF012814;
        Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:38:34 GMT
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
        by duck.linux-mips.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pABDcXH7012813;
        Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:38:33 GMT
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:38:33 +0000
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To:     Jayachandran C <jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>,
        Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: Mark Netlogic chips as SMT capable
Message-ID: <20111111133833.GA12648@linux-mips.org>
References: <cover.1321010998.git.jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>
 <7a1a9bad5b110e931f1662ebaae4c0164d4dcc84.1321011002.git.jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>
 <20111111125436.GD28303@linux-mips.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111111125436.GD28303@linux-mips.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-archive-position: 31559
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips
Return-Path: <linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org>
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 10295

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:11:08PM +0530, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:11:08 +0530
> > From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> 
> Normally if you're resending other people's patches they should be sent
> out with your email in the email's From: header and with the patch
> author's name and Email address in a From: line in the first (important,
> otherwise git won't parse it right) of the body.  Somehow here Hillf
> ended up in the From: header which may be confusing, might upset him
> and might also trigger spam filters.
> 
> No need to resend but you may want to fix that for the next batch of
> patches.

And promptly the reply went to Hillf, whops :)

  Ralf