From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: Verify we can perform the remapping requested
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:02:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111112090203.GD11779@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m11uteo57u.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:59:33AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
> > Okay, thinking more about this, I am not so sure anymore it is a really
> > good idea to fix it this way. It basically signals the driver that DMA
> > is not possible with the device if the aperture does not fit into
> > the dma_mask. But DMA within the ZONE_DMA might still work, no?
> >
> > So I think the right way to fix it is to return a dma-mapping error if
> > and only if the address needs to be remapped by the aperture (of swiotlb or
> > gart).
>
> Perhaps I am mistaken but since the method is iommu type specific if we
> don't actually use the iommu we should not call the method so I think
> this is patch is already implementing what you want.
No it does not. With GART or SWIOTLB all DMA-mapping functions call
directly into the IOMMU driver. The driver then checks whether it needs
to remap or not (see dma_capable() in SWIOTLB or need_iommu() in GART).
I think the check you want to add needs to happen after these checks in
each of the IOMMU drivers.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-12 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 21:19 [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: Verify we can perform the remapping requested Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: " Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-24 10:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-11 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-11 18:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-12 9:02 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-10-21 0:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-10-24 15:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-27 0:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-10-27 6:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111112090203.GD11779@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.