From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, gorcunov@gmail.com,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC] kvm tools: Implement multiple VQ for virtio-net
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:05:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111114130507.GA18288@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLE4yRO+5XncrDEzVh5-RGXG+=HGTAmQ=bX=KMsDqf=feA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:25:17PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why both the bandwidth and latency performance are dropping so dramatically
> > with multiple VQ?
>
> What's the expected benefit from multiple VQs
Heh, the original patchset didn't mention this :) It really should.
They are supposed to speed up networking for high smp guests.
> i.e. why are doing the patches Sasha?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-14 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-11 22:12 [RFC] kvm tools: Implement multiple VQ for virtio-net Sasha Levin
2011-11-13 10:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-13 15:00 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-13 15:00 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-13 15:32 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 2:04 ` Asias He
2011-11-14 2:04 ` Asias He
2011-11-14 10:15 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 10:15 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-15 4:44 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-11-15 15:30 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-15 15:30 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-16 6:10 ` jason wang
2011-11-16 9:09 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-11-16 10:05 ` jason wang
2011-11-14 12:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-14 13:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-11-16 0:04 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-16 7:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-21 0:41 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-22 18:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-11-22 18:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-11-14 12:25 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111114130507.GA18288@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.