From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RQhlT-0000sO-R7 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:51:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:51:03 -0500 From: Don Zickus Subject: Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? Message-ID: <20111116155103.GG8685@redhat.com> References: <20111116011221.GA6216@verge.net.au> <20111116023503.GA4468@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111116023503.GA4468@verge.net.au> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Simon Horman Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:35:03AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Am=E9rico Wang wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman wrot= e: > > > > > > Hi Am=E9rico, > > > > > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > > > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > > > (development) branch. =A0And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent= of v2.0.2. > > > > > = > > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not > > v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? > = > Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. > However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with > expectations. Are you creating annotated tags or lightweight tags? That might be the difference. Cheers, Don _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec