From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NUMA emulation x86_64: numa=fake parameter for custom nodes distance
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:53:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111118115336.18de45a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321617308-4998-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com>
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:55:07 +0100
Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com> wrote:
> As default, when numa emulation is turned on, node distance table
> uses physical distance, so for 4 nodes emulated on 1 physical table is
>
> node 0 1 2 3
> 0: 10 10 10 10
> 1: 10 10 10 10
> 2: 10 10 10 10
> 3: 10 10 10 10
>
> This patch adds new [distance] argument to
>
> numa=fake=<number/size of nodes>[,distance]
>
> When distance argument is used, it sets linear distance between nodes
> like that:
>
> __distance__
> ___|___ ____|___ ________ ________
> | | | | | | | |
> | node1 |---| node 2 |---| node 3 |---| node 4 |
> |_______| |________| |________| |________|
> | | |
> | | |
> |____distance * 2________| |
> | |
> |____________distance * 3______________|
>
> This feature might be useful for testing some numa awareness features in
> both user and kernel spaces.
>
"might" is a red flag. We don't merge things which might be useful!
*Is* it useful? If so then please tell us why and explain how it might
be useful to others.
> @@ -404,6 +406,17 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
> if (emu_nid_to_phys[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> emu_nid_to_phys[i] = dfl_phys_nid;
>
> + /* load distance level parameter */
> + dist_level = -1;
> + c = strchr(emu_cmdline, ',');
> + if (c) {
> + c++;
> + ret = kstrtoul(c, 10, &dist_level);
> + if (ret < 0 || dist_level < LOCAL_DISTANCE ||
> + dist_level * max_emu_nid > ULONG_MAX)
> + dist_level = -1;
If this happens, the user goofed and we should tell them, with a printk.
[patch 2/2] adds the documentation for the feature and should be
included in the same patch as the implementation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-18 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-18 11:55 [PATCH 1/2] NUMA emulation x86_64: numa=fake parameter for custom nodes distance Petr Holasek
2011-11-18 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] NUMA emulation x86_64: Documentation changes in boot-options.txt Petr Holasek
2011-11-18 19:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-11-19 0:31 ` NUMA emulation x86_64: numa=fake parameter for custom nodes distance Petr Holasek
2011-11-20 2:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-21 20:41 ` Petr Holasek
2011-11-21 22:24 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-20 2:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] " David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111118115336.18de45a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.