From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: report link speed to ethtool
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111118191722.GA16429@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321643431.2883.39.camel@bwh-desktop>
On Fri, Nov 18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:43 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 17:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > > The reported data refers to VMWare vmxnet.
> > > NAK, we should not just make things up.
> >
> > So how about removing veth_get_settings, vmxnet3_get_settings,
> > tun_get_settings and other functions that escaped my grep?
>
> If they can't provide meaningful information then maybe they should be
> removed. However, that could result in a regression for existing
> working configurations. (This isn't the same as the case you're trying
> to fix, since those applications have never worked with xen-netfront or
> many other drivers that don't implement get_settings.)
That may be.
How about a new generic ethtool_op_get_settings_veth which returns fake
values for all relevant drivers (virtio, xen-netfront, and the ones
listed above)?
Olaf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-18 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-18 16:48 [PATCH] xen-netfront: report link speed to ethtool Olaf Hering
2011-11-18 17:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-18 17:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-18 18:43 ` Olaf Hering
2011-11-18 19:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-18 19:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-18 19:17 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2011-11-18 18:44 ` Rick Jones
2011-11-18 18:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-11-18 18:58 ` use a special value of -2 for virtual devices to report indeterminate speed? Rick Jones
2011-11-18 19:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-18 19:11 ` [PATCH] xen-netfront: report link speed to ethtool Pavel Matěja
2011-11-18 19:37 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-11-19 1:13 ` James Harper
2011-11-19 1:32 ` James Harper
2011-11-18 19:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111118191722.GA16429@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.