[PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's

[jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles)]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 04:28 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> >When probing the VIC, the ST variant has a different probing method to
> >account for the extra interrupts which meant we didn't previously call
> >vic_register() which registered the irq_domain.
> >
> >Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> >Cc: Russell King<rmk+linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >Cc: Marc Zyngier<marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles<jamie@jamieiles.com>
> >---
> >
> >I _think_ it's just Nomadik affected here which I don't have access to.
> >I can send an updated pull request or put it in Russell's tracker,
> >whichever is easiest.
> 
> This also affects mach-u300 and mach-ep93xx OTOH.
> 
> This seems to be based on something else that is out-of-tree
> so I don't get the whole picture...

Sorry, should have specified the base - this is the VIC device 
tree/MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER stuff that is in next.  I did look at u300 and 
ep93xx, but it looks like their VIC's are 0x1000/0x10000 apart 
respectively when registered so weren't the ST type that supported 64 
IRQ's.

Jamie