From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:14:11 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] Support for Cadence GEM in the MACB driver In-Reply-To: <20111121100020.GB7314@totoro> References: <20111121100020.GB7314@totoro> Message-ID: <201111232114.12124.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 21 November 2011, Jamie Iles wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Please consider pulling the patches to add support for Cadence GEM to > the MACB driver. These have been ready to go for a little while but got > held up with the rename of Ethernet drivers in the last merge window. > It would be great if we can get some exposure in -next for a little > while before the next merge window. Hi Jamie, I was actually meaning to pull these in time for 3.2, but for some reason this got dropped on the floor when I was travelling just before and during the merge window. Anyway, I've pulled them into the next/driver branch of the arm-soc tree now. Thanks for your patience! Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Support for Cadence GEM in the MACB driver Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:14:11 +0000 Message-ID: <201111232114.12124.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20111121100020.GB7314@totoro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" , Nicolas Ferre , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Jamie Iles Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:64828 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753248Ab1KWVOV (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:14:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111121100020.GB7314@totoro> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 21 November 2011, Jamie Iles wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Please consider pulling the patches to add support for Cadence GEM to > the MACB driver. These have been ready to go for a little while but got > held up with the rename of Ethernet drivers in the last merge window. > It would be great if we can get some exposure in -next for a little > while before the next merge window. Hi Jamie, I was actually meaning to pull these in time for 3.2, but for some reason this got dropped on the floor when I was travelling just before and during the merge window. Anyway, I've pulled them into the next/driver branch of the arm-soc tree now. Thanks for your patience! Arnd