From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124071406.GS19986@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111123225124.GK9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:51:24PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:44:50AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > Looks like the same error I faced before:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=131914543319956&w=2
> > which resulted in some concerns about locking correctness. On i.MX28 we
> > usually use
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/100744/focus=100746
> >
> > (though this patch wasn't accepted either. The right fix is to convert
> > mxs to the upcoming clk framework, which didn't land into mainline yet.)
>
> Irrespective of the clk framework. If you convert to the clk_prepare()
> methodology, then you fix this bug. You can do this as a two-step thing.
Yeah, OK, I should have said:
The right fix is to make clk_enable atomic on mxs which back
then was agreed to be done when converting to the new clk
framework.
> [..]
>
> So really, there's no excuse not to fix this for the imx/mxwhatever SoCs
> today - the clk framework is totally irrelevant as far as this goes.
I think doing the clk_prepare seperation and converting to the clk
framework in one step will be easier.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 11:36 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context Peter Rusko
2011-11-23 12:44 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-11-23 13:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-11-23 18:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-23 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 6:32 ` Shawn Guo
2011-11-24 7:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-11-24 9:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-24 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 14:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-11 17:13 Dario Faggioli
2011-10-11 17:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-08-30 13:28 sandeep kumar
2011-08-30 15:14 ` Dave Hylands
[not found] ` <CAL7WMDf-VEOBs6o-hup-qP17AYfp+=Eb1E9w=33d93GWYa=fBw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABi1daHSEegXLr4MyK0xkTKxwEwwc-8bNc8jkWrpUN=ujbj_9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-31 8:15 ` sandeep kumar
2011-05-10 5:38 Amit Virdi
2011-05-10 5:38 ` Amit Virdi
2011-05-10 5:38 ` Amit Virdi
2011-05-10 9:32 ` Alan Cox
2011-05-10 9:32 ` Alan Cox
2011-05-10 9:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-28 13:24 Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-06 9:04 Holger Schurig
2008-05-06 9:22 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111124071406.GS19986@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.