All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Cc: 최종환 <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] max8997_charger: Remove duplicate module.h
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 03:34:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111125233436.GA19161@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16505126.116361322047601084.JavaMail.weblogic@epml27>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:26:41AM +0000, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> Sender : 최종환<jhbird.choi@samsung.com> S4(선임)/선임/S/W Solution개발팀(S.LSI)/삼성전자
> Date : 2011-11-23 13:40 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : [PATCH] max8997_charger: Remove duplicate module.h
> > 
> > From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
> > 
> > module.h was included twice.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
> 
> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>

The issue introduced in post-3.1 kernels, and since I don't want
to send it to Linus now (as it is not a regression fix), nor I want
to pull -rc kernels into battery GIT tree, I'll just let the patch
sit for awhile till 3.2 released. And during merge window I'll apply
it, just before sending pull request.

That is, I noticed the patch, it looks OK, and I'll apply it. Just
not now.

Thanks!

p.s.
The other option you have is to send the patch via -trivial tree.
I'm fine either way.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-25 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-23 11:26 [PATCH] max8997_charger: Remove duplicate module.h MyungJoo Ham
2011-11-25 23:34 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-01-06  0:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-23  4:40 jhbird.choi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111125233436.GA19161@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhbird.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.