All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtlwifi: fix lps_lock deadlock
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:33:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111128093339.GC2372@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111128092308.GB2372@redhat.com>

rtl_lps_leave can be called from interrupt context, so we have to
disable interrupts when taking lps_lock.

Below is full lockdep info about deadlock:

[   93.815269] =================================
[   93.815390] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[   93.815472] 2.6.41.1-3.offch.fc15.x86_64.debug #1
[   93.815556] ---------------------------------
[   93.815635] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[   93.815743] swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[   93.815832]  (&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa025dad6>] rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
[   93.815947] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8108e10d>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0xd0c
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8108efb3>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff814e981d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x79
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa025de34>] rtl_swlps_rf_awake+0x5a/0x76 [rtlwifi]
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa025aec0>] rtl_op_config+0x12a/0x32a [rtlwifi]
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa01d614b>] ieee80211_hw_config+0x124/0x129 [mac80211]
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa01e0af3>] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work+0x32/0x47 [mac80211]
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff81075aa5>] process_one_work+0x205/0x3e7
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff81076753>] worker_thread+0xda/0x15d
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8107a119>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
[   93.815947]   [<ffffffff814f3184>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[   93.815947] irq event stamp: 547822
[   93.815947] hardirqs last  enabled at (547822): [<ffffffff814ea1a7>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x61
[   93.815947] hardirqs last disabled at (547821): [<ffffffff814e9987>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x8e
[   93.815947] softirqs last  enabled at (547790): [<ffffffff810623ed>] _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x15
[   93.815947] softirqs last disabled at (547791): [<ffffffff814f327c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[   93.815947]
[   93.815947] other info that might help us debug this:
[   93.815947]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   93.815947]
[   93.815947]        CPU0
[   93.815947]        ----
[   93.815947]   lock(&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock);
[   93.815947]   <Interrupt>
[   93.815947]     lock(&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock);
[   93.815947]
[   93.815947]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   93.815947]
[   93.815947] no locks held by swapper/0.
[   93.815947]
[   93.815947] stack backtrace:
[   93.815947] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.41.1-3.offch.fc15.x86_64.debug #1
[   93.815947] Call Trace:
[   93.815947]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff814dfd00>] print_usage_bug+0x1e7/0x1f8
[   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8101a849>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2c/0x49
[   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108d55c>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug.part.18+0x1a0/0x1a0
[   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108dc8a>] mark_lock+0x106/0x220
[   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108e099>] __lock_acquire+0x2f5/0xd0c
[   93.815947]  [<ffffffff810152af>] ? native_sched_clock+0x34/0x36
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff810152ba>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81080181>] ? sched_clock_local+0x12/0x75
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8108efb3>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814e981d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x79
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81422467>] ? skb_dequeue+0x62/0x6d
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025f677>] _rtl_pci_ips_leave_tasklet+0xe/0x10 [rtlwifi]
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8106281f>] tasklet_action+0x8d/0xee
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff810629ce>] __do_softirq+0x112/0x25a
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814f327c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81010bf6>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xa1
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81062d7d>] irq_exit+0x5d/0xcf
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814f3b7e>] do_IRQ+0x8e/0xa5
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814ea533>] common_interrupt+0x73/0x73
[   93.830125]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8108b825>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff812bb6d5>] ? intel_idle+0xe5/0x10c
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff812bb6d1>] ? intel_idle+0xe1/0x10c
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff813f8d5e>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x11c/0x1fe
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8100e2ef>] cpu_idle+0xab/0x101
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814c6373>] rest_init+0xd7/0xde
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814c629c>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4bbb0>] start_kernel+0x3dd/0x3ea
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b2c4>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
[   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b3ca>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x102/0x111

Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755154

Reported-by: vjain02@students.poly.edu
Reported-and-tested-by: Oliver Paukstadt <pstadt@sourcentral.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2: add bug report reference

 drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
index db52628..55c8e50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ void rtl_lps_enter(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	if (mac->link_state != MAC80211_LINKED)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 
 	/* Idle for a while if we connect to AP a while ago. */
 	if (mac->cnt_after_linked >= 2) {
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ void rtl_lps_enter(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 		}
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 }
 
 /*Leave the leisure power save mode.*/
@@ -416,8 +416,9 @@ void rtl_lps_leave(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
 	struct rtl_ps_ctl *ppsc = rtl_psc(rtl_priv(hw));
 	struct rtl_hal *rtlhal = rtl_hal(rtl_priv(hw));
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock, flags);
 
 	if (ppsc->fwctrl_lps) {
 		if (ppsc->dot11_psmode != EACTIVE) {
@@ -438,7 +439,7 @@ void rtl_lps_leave(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 			rtl_lps_set_psmode(hw, EACTIVE);
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /* For sw LPS*/
@@ -539,9 +540,9 @@ void rtl_swlps_rf_awake(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 		RT_CLEAR_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_PS_LEVEL_ASPM);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 	rtl_ps_set_rf_state(hw, ERFON, RF_CHANGE_BY_PS);
-	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 }
 
 void rtl_swlps_rfon_wq_callback(void *data)
@@ -574,9 +575,9 @@ void rtl_swlps_rf_sleep(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	if (rtlpriv->link_info.busytraffic)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 	rtl_ps_set_rf_state(hw, ERFSLEEP, RF_CHANGE_BY_PS);
-	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock);
 
 	if (ppsc->reg_rfps_level & RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_ASPM &&
 		!RT_IN_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_PS_LEVEL_ASPM)) {
-- 
1.7.1


      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-28  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-25 11:08 [PATCH] rtlwifi: fix lps_lock deadlock Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-25 17:34 ` Larry Finger
2011-11-28  9:23   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-28  9:33     ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111128093339.GC2372@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.