From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: reorganize muxes to a standard pattern Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:38:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20111128093835.GA4243@pengutronix.de> References: <1321220474-11378-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20111127214847.547542fb@endymion.delvare> <87sjl9gtcv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20111128092227.3d5d6a25@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128092227.3d5d6a25-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Guenter Roeck , Rodolfo Giometti , Michael Lawnick , Peter Korsgaard List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/7171/focus=3D7244 >=20 > Ah, yes, that's the discussion I was looking for, thanks for digging it > out. My point wasn't totally wrong back then, but Wolfram's is simply > better, I admit. I agree :) Okay, so I'll update the documentation as well. What about include/linux/gpio-i2cmux.h and its users? I'd like consistency, but renaming header files is not too nice... Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7TVpsACgkQD27XaX1/VRvoywCgpEId8VQC/L/vsa0MsUcXCXDy KfgAoIzdwx6h4bmisKwn94Q44UANwaH/ =M3GK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--