From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Resize command syntax wrong? Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:15:47 +0600 Message-ID: <20111201011547.66633b20@natsu> References: <4ED67A2E.9080809@cfl.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/HPsQ/nw7u3iF_uOQyV5v6J/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Hullen@t-online.de, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: helmut@hullen.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: --Sig_/HPsQ/nw7u3iF_uOQyV5v6J/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30 Nov 2011 19:59:00 +0100 "Helmut Hullen" wrote: > > Currently the resize command is under filesystem, and takes a path to > > the mounted filesystem. This seems wrong to me. Shouldn't it be > > under device, and take a path to a device to resize? >=20 > No - it's a filesystem operation. Are you sure about that? >=20 > p.e. > You start with a system of 2 disks. They get filled nearly =20 > simultaneously. > Then you add a 3rd disk (which is empty at that time). Now it's a good =20 > idea to run "balance" for equalizing the filling. What if I need to replace an individual device with a smaller or a larger o= ne? --=20 With respect, Roman ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Stallman had a printer, with code he could not see. So he began to tinker, and set the software free." --Sig_/HPsQ/nw7u3iF_uOQyV5v6J/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7WgOMACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiVbwCeLGXzaq7+10hXebNkVS6m2pxE m14An1bVzBWuvrRnhIyVM5Xhggg2LEv+ =Ay19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HPsQ/nw7u3iF_uOQyV5v6J/--