From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] RFC: wait queue usage
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:19:16 +0100
Message-ID: <20111201141916.GA12840@aepfle.de>
References: <patchbomb.1322737756@probook.site>
	<20111201140150.GC61203@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111201140150.GC61203@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Dec 01, Tim Deegan wrote:

> At 12:09 +0100 on 01 Dec (1322741356), Olaf Hering wrote:
> > 
> > The following series is my current state of an attempt to use wait queues for
> > xenpaging and mem_event handling. I post it here for review and comments.
> > 
> > This series conflicts with work from Andres Lagar-Cavilla.
> 
> Can you be clear about which of Andres's patchsets you are objecting to?
> I have five series (!) of his on my todo list right now. 

The "Improve ring management for memory events" change which tries to
achieve the same result as my "mem_event: use wait queue when ring is
full" change.
There is already a discussion about which way to choose.

Olaf