From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 11:03:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20111203110309.GA6043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1322765339-29879-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112012137.08119.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111202003333.GC31903@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112022336.19993.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:44970 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754498Ab1LCLD3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2011 06:03:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112022336.19993.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Paul Mundt , Magnus Damm , Kukjin Kim , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're > > right it doesn't achieve anything (except avoiding redundancy once 1/3 > > gets applied I guess). > But the patch removed useful code without adding any replacements, as far > as I could see it. The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code, this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using the generic code instead. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 11:03:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor In-Reply-To: <201112022336.19993.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1322765339-29879-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112012137.08119.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111202003333.GC31903@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112022336.19993.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: <20111203110309.GA6043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're > > right it doesn't achieve anything (except avoiding redundancy once 1/3 > > gets applied I guess). > But the patch removed useful code without adding any replacements, as far > as I could see it. The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code, this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using the generic code instead.