From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/7] driver-core/cpu: Add cpu_is_hotpluggable() for rcutorture error analysis
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:06:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111203210650.GA17377@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322937282-19846-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:34:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The rcutorture test now can automatically exercise CPU hotplug and
> collect success statistics, which can be correlated with other rcutorture
> activity. This permits rcutorture to completely exercise RCU regardless
> of what sort of userspace and filesystem layout is in use. Unfortunately,
> rcutorture is happy to attempt to offline CPUs that cannot be offlined,
> for example, CPU 0 in both the x86 and ARM architectures. Although this
> allows rcutorture testing to proceed normally, it confounds attempts at
> error analysis due to the resulting flood of spurious CPU-hotplug errors.
>
> Therefore, this commit creates a cpu_is_hotpluggable() function that
> allows rcutorture to avoid attempting to offline CPUs that are not
> hotpluggable, which in turn allows rcutorture to avoid reporting spurious
> CPU-hotplug errors. Note that this function is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> to allow rcutorture to use it when compiled as a kernel module.
> This commit also includes modifications to rcutorture to use this
> new function.
I'd suggest writing this as a two-patch series: add the API, then use
it.
I'd also suggest making the more general case for this API, beyond just
rcutorture.
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct sysdev_class cpu_sysdev_class = {
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_sysdev_class);
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sys_device *, cpu_sys_devices);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, is_hotpluggable);
[...]
> @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ int __cpuinit register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
>
> error = sysdev_register(&cpu->sysdev);
>
> - if (!error && cpu->hotpluggable)
> + if (!error && cpu->hotpluggable) {
> register_cpu_control(cpu);
> + per_cpu(is_hotpluggable, num) = 1;
> + }
This information already exists in the ->hotpluggable field of "struct
cpu". I'd suggest an alternate approach (included as a patch below),
which avoids the need to add a new per_cpu property redundant with
->hotpluggable.
Note that you can get to the patch below via "git am --scissors", or
just by copy/pasting it.
---8<---
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: [PATCH] driver-core/cpu: Expose hotpluggability to the rest of the kernel
When architectures register CPUs, they indicate whether the CPU allows
hotplugging; notably, x86 and ARM don't allow hotplugging CPU 0.
Userspace can easily query the hotpluggability of a CPU via sysfs;
however, the kernel has no convenient way of accessing that property in
an architecture-independent way. While the kernel can simply try it and
see, some code needs to distinguish between "hotplug failed" and
"hotplug has no hope of working on this CPU"; for example, rcutorture's
CPU hotplug tests want to avoid drowning out real hotplug failures with
expected failures.
Expose this property via a new cpu_is_hotpluggable function, so that the
rest of the kernel can access it in an architecture-independent way.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
drivers/base/cpu.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 251acea..3991502 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -247,6 +247,13 @@ struct sys_device *get_cpu_sysdev(unsigned cpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cpu_sysdev);
+bool cpu_is_hotpluggable(unsigned cpu)
+{
+ struct sys_device *dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu);
+ return dev && container_of(dev, struct cpu, sysdev)->hotpluggable;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_is_hotpluggable);
+
int __init cpu_dev_init(void)
{
int err;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 6cb60fd..305c263 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct cpu {
extern int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num);
extern struct sys_device *get_cpu_sysdev(unsigned cpu);
+extern bool cpu_is_hotpluggable(unsigned cpu);
extern int cpu_add_sysdev_attr(struct sysdev_attribute *attr);
extern void cpu_remove_sysdev_attr(struct sysdev_attribute *attr);
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-03 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-03 18:34 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Preview of fourth set of RCU changes for 3.3 Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/7] rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/7] rcu: Irq nesting is always 0 on rcu_enter_idle_common Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/7] rcu: Keep invoking callbacks if CPU otherwise idle Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/7] rcu: Adaptive dyntick-idle preparation Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/7] rcu: remove redundant rcu_cpu_stall_suppress declaration Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/7] driver-core/cpu: Add cpu_is_hotpluggable() for rcutorture error analysis Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 21:06 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2011-12-03 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-03 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Quiet RCU-lockdep warnings involving interrupt disabling Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-05 9:19 ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-05 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 1:26 ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 2:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel.h: sched: introduce might_sleep_disabled() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtmutex: introduce rt_mutex_lock_irqdisabled() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 3:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: use rt_mutex_lock_irqdisabled() in rcu_boost() Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 9:52 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Quiet RCU-lockdep warnings involving interrupt disabling Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 10:05 ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 12:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 16:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-12-05 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 10:03 ` Yong Zhang
2011-12-05 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111203210650.GA17377@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.