diff for duplicates of <20111204211454.GA13000@infradead.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 4ceca89..c34f959 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -10,3 +10,8 @@ On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:31:21PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
 Looks good, except that the help text for it doesn't look overly useful.
 I don't think we "optimise" for large filesystems, we simply fill most
 of it, which is what the documentation should mention.
+
+_______________________________________________
+xfs mailing list
+xfs@oss.sgi.com
+http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 015b8c6..932532d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: add --largefs check option\0"
  "Date\0Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:14:54 -0500\0"
  "To\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0"
- "Cc\0xfs@oss.sgi.com"
-  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org"
+  linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
+ " xfs@oss.sgi.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:31:21PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:\n"
@@ -20,6 +20,11 @@
  "\n"
  "Looks good, except that the help text for it doesn't look overly useful.\n"
  "I don't think we \"optimise\" for large filesystems, we simply fill most\n"
- of it, which is what the documentation should mention.
+ "of it, which is what the documentation should mention.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "xfs mailing list\n"
+ "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
+ http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
 
-5e9902f24c4f10891217867ce7e94047343fcfd22686815082285ef75f3615fa
+c6084147634d9e1c3844f32c3423d2f95fd1ad507523284468fd1203d6ccb9cf
