From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 00:15:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20111205001500.GA10173@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1322765339-29879-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112042156.59990.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111204231005.GA4255@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112050115.18489.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:33865 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755859Ab1LEAPE (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:15:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112050115.18489.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Paul Mundt , Magnus Damm , Kukjin Kim , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch > > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx > > power management - so let's see what Kukjin thinks is best. > OTOH, it will conflict with some patches I have in the works. Ah, OK - in that case I guess it's sensible if you apply it. Ideally it could be on a separate branch so it could be cross-merged with other trees if there's a need later. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 00:15:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor In-Reply-To: <201112050115.18489.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1322765339-29879-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112042156.59990.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111204231005.GA4255@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201112050115.18489.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: <20111205001500.GA10173@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch > > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx > > power management - so let's see what Kukjin thinks is best. > OTOH, it will conflict with some patches I have in the works. Ah, OK - in that case I guess it's sensible if you apply it. Ideally it could be on a separate branch so it could be cross-merged with other trees if there's a need later.