From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?utf-8?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont" Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] if_ether.h: Add IEEE 802.1 Local Experimental Ethertype 1. Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:46:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201112051746.18180.remi@remlab.net> References: <1322685846-7790-1-git-send-email-sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Orishko , "David S. Miller" To: Sjur =?utf-8?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?= Return-path: Received: from yop.chewa.net ([91.121.105.214]:38725 "EHLO yop.chewa.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932348Ab1LEPqW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:46:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 5 d=C3=A9cembre 2011 16:33:50 Sjur Br=C3=A6ndeland, vous avez = =C3=A9crit : > Hi R=C3=A9mi, >=20 > > It's even weirder then. If you have control over both ends and the = NCM > > 1.0 interface is not adequate, then you really should use your own = CDC > > class for the purpose. >=20 > The reason we use NCM is performance: CDC normally gives less than 10= 0Mbps, > while NCM can give you up to 200Mbps. NCM is a sub-profile of CDC, so that statement makes no sense to me. --=20 R=C3=A9mi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis