From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
rjw@sisk.pl, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, jmorris@namei.org,
bp@amd64.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Usermodehelper: Introduce reference counting to solve usermodehelper_disabled race
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:38:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205213832.GM627@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111205212524.27496.58775.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 02:56:15AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> This patch adds the necessary synchronization framework to fix the race
> condition with the 'usermodehelper_disabled' flag, by implementing a
> refcounting solution. Specifically, it introduces the pair get_usermodehelper()
> and put_usermodehelper(), which can be used by the readers (those who want to
> read the value of the usermodehelper_disabled flag, such as _request_firmware()
> in this case). The writers (those who enable/disable usermodehelpers by
> setting/resetting that flag) can use the pair umh_control_begin() and
> umh_control_done().
>
> The reason for using a refcounting solution and not just a plain mutex, is
> that we don't want to unnecessarily serialize all users of request_firmware(),
> which act as readers. But note that we cannot use reader-writer locks here
> because the readers sleep (waiting for the firmware load from user-space),
> and sleeping with spinlocks held is not allowed. So refcounting implemented
> using mutex locks underneath, seems to be the best fit here.
I haven't really read the patch yet but, from the description, why not
use rwsem?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 21:25 [PATCH 0/2] PM / Usermodehelper: Fix freezer failures due to racy usermodehelper_is_disabled() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Usermodehelper: Introduce reference counting to solve usermodehelper_disabled race Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-05 21:38 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-12-07 12:21 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 0:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-12-07 12:30 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-07 13:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-12-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / request_firmware(): Use the refcounting solution to fix the race Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111205213832.GM627@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.