From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/4] xfs: fix nfs export of 64-bit inodes numbers on 32-bit kernels
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:39:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206163913.GP29840@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111202172908.GA10803@infradead.org>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:29:08PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:07:12AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > To what extent did you test this one? Anything in particular I should
> > look for when I test it?
>
> Create a large filesystem, mount it using -o inode64 on a 32-bit kernel,
> find an inode that actually uses more than 32-bits, and try to access
> it from an nfs client.
>
> Alternatively you could probably reproduce it using the open by handle
> system calls, I have an idea how to turn that into a test case for
> xfstests using a large loopback filesystem.
I tested this on a pair of i386 boxes with a large loop filesystem and
inode64. Without the fix I got ESTALE on any inodes > 32 bits, and with
the patch it works great.
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 8:17 [PATCH 0/4] xfs fixes for Linux 3.2-rc3 Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 18:01 ` Ben Myers
2011-11-28 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: validate acl count Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: force buffer writeback before blocking on the ilock in inode reclaim Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix the logspace waiting algorithm Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 23:56 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-01 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-02 11:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-05 2:53 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-05 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 18:32 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-01 20:43 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-12-01 19:28 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-12-02 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-02 16:02 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-11-29 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfs fixes for Linux 3.2-rc3 Ben Myers
2011-11-30 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 8:58 ` [PATCH 5/4] xfs: fix nfs export of 64-bit inodes numbers on 32-bit kernels Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-02 16:07 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-02 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-06 16:39 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206163913.GP29840@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.