From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/locking] lockdep, rtmutex, bug: Show taint flags on error
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:14:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206191458.GA25568@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111206182847.GB12094@elte.hu>
Anyway, SOB flaming aside, i think there's now consensus that we
don't want to disable lockdep for TAINT_OOT modules.
Mind (re-)sending a delta patch against tip:master that excludes
that taint flag in addition to the already excluded
TAINT_FIRMWARE case? That should close this rather verbose
chapter of taint flag handling changes for good ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 3:36 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep,rtmutex,bug: Show taint flags on error Ben Hutchings
2011-10-31 1:59 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-16 21:52 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-16 22:24 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-17 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-17 15:18 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-06 9:38 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, rtmutex, bug: " tip-bot for Ben Hutchings
2011-12-06 15:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-06 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 18:17 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-06 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-12-06 21:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-07 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 18:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 18:14 ` Nick Bowler
2011-12-06 18:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 18:21 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 18:23 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206191458.GA25568@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.