From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code cleanup
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:25:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111208192533.GA19310@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112042000070.5963@cactuar.localhost>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:01:39PM -0200, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0000, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> >>This patch removes commented code, useless comments, blank lines and fix
> >>coding style of the headers of functions.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com>
> >>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> >>Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> >>---
> >> /*
> >>- * Description: Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>- *
> >>- * Parameters:
> >>- * In:
> >>- * dwIoBase - I/O base address
> >>- * byContntOffset - address of EEPROM
> >>- * byTestBits - bits to test
> >>- * Out:
> >>- * none
> >>- *
> >>- * Return Value: true if all test bits off; otherwise false
> >>- *
> >>+ * Test if bits off in eeprom
> >> */
> >
> >Some of these seems sort of useful. It might be better to change
> >them to doc-book format instead of deleting them:
> >
> >/**
> >* SROMbIsRegBitsOff() - Test if bits off in eeprom
> >* @dwIoBase: I/O base address
> >* @byContntOffset: Address of EEPROM
> >* @byTestBits: Bits to test
> >*
> >* Returns true if all test bits off; otherwise false.
> >*/
> >
> >There is a howto in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion Dan. I will do it for these 3 patches.
>
> Greg, please delte this patches, I will sent them again.
Ugh, "which" patches are you referring to?
I see lots here from you, with different back-and-forth from Dan, and I
don't really see an easy way to tell which thread from which, given that
you didn't thread the patches using git-send-email.
So, I've dropped all patches from you from my patch queue, can you
please resend the ones that I am supposed to apply that have been
reviewed by Dan as being acceptable?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 19:58 [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code cleanup Marcos Paulo de Souza
2011-12-03 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-12-04 22:01 ` Marcos Paulo de Souza
2011-12-08 19:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111208192533.GA19310@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcos.mage@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.