From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751309Ab1LIHNA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:13:00 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40817 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811Ab1LIHM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:12:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:11:09 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: Petr Holasek , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Arapov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NUMA x86: add constraints check for nid parameters Message-ID: <20111209071109.GE24537@elte.hu> References: <1322739907-4695-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com> <20111201133451.5fc1ee7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20111201231441.GA3293@stainedmachine.redhat.com> <20111201152851.7e39f034.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20111202105538.GB2188@dhcp-27-244.brq.redhat.com> <20111207194311.GB26060@dhcp-27-244.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > Petr Holasek writes: > > > This patch adds constraints checks for numa_set_distance() > > function. It emits warning when pxms are used uninitialized > > when parsing the SRAT. > > Can you expand on the motivation for this please? > Is this to catch buggy code or to catch buggy SRATs? Both. > If the later are they actually out there? Not that i know of - they would likely not boot Linux very well today. Thanks, Ingo