From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xen/xenbus-backend: Only register device if communication ring is local
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:42:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111212154227.GB21558@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323541791-18006-7-git-send-email-waldi@debian.org>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:29:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xenbus/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c | 13 ++-----------
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.h | 2 ++
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/Makefile b/drivers/xen/xenbus/Makefile
> index 31e2e90..d751f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/Makefile
> @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ xenbus-objs += xenbus_comms.o
> xenbus-objs += xenbus_xs.o
> xenbus-objs += xenbus_probe.o
>
> +xenbus-be-objs-$(CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND) += xenbus_dev_backend.o
> xenbus-be-objs-$(CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND) += xenbus_probe_backend.o
> xenbus-objs += $(xenbus-be-objs-y)
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND) += xenbus_dev_backend.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND) += xenbus_probe_frontend.o
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c
> index a2092bd..fb87f1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/capability.h>
>
> #include <xen/page.h>
> @@ -11,8 +10,6 @@
>
> #include "xenbus_comms.h"
>
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -
> static int xenbus_backend_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -67,23 +64,17 @@ static struct miscdevice xenbus_backend_dev = {
> .fops = &xenbus_backend_fops,
> };
>
> -static int __init xenbus_backend_init(void)
> +int __init xenbus_backend_init(void)
> {
> int err;
>
> - if (!xen_initial_domain())
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> err = misc_register(&xenbus_backend_dev);
> if (err)
> printk(KERN_ERR "Could not register xenbus backend device\n");
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void __exit xenbus_backend_exit(void)
> +void __exit xenbus_backend_exit(void)
> {
> misc_deregister(&xenbus_backend_dev);
> }
> -
> -module_init(xenbus_backend_init);
> -module_exit(xenbus_backend_exit);
Why are we removing the module functionality?
Can't this [the purpose of this patch] be done while still maintaining the module functionality?
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.h b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d986853
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +int xenbus_backend_init(void);
> +void xenbus_backend_exit(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> index 1b178c6..4eff095 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> #include <xen/hvm.h>
>
> #include "xenbus_comms.h"
> +#include "xenbus_dev_backend.h"
> #include "xenbus_probe.h"
>
>
> @@ -641,6 +642,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_cancel);
> /* A flag to determine if xenstored is 'ready' (i.e. has started) */
> int xenstored_ready;
>
> +/* A flag to determine if xenstored is 'local' */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND
> +static int xenstored_local;
bool?
> +#endif
>
> int register_xenstore_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> {
> @@ -675,6 +680,14 @@ static int __init xenbus_probe_initcall(void)
> if (!xen_domain())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND
> + if (xenstored_local) {
> + int ret = xenbus_backend_init();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (xen_initial_domain() || xen_hvm_domain())
> return 0;
>
> @@ -747,9 +760,14 @@ static int __init xenbus_init(void)
> if (xen_store_evtchn)
> xenstored_ready = 1;
> else {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND
> + xenstored_local = 1;
> err = xenstored_local_init();
> if (err)
> goto out_error;
> +#else
> + BUG();
No way. A WARN, sure - but BUG() is way too intense for this.
> +#endif
> }
> xen_store_interface = mfn_to_virt(xen_store_mfn);
> }
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-10 18:29 [PATCH 0/6] V3, Move stuff out of xenfs Bastian Blank
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] xen: Add privcmd device driver Bastian Blank
2011-12-14 18:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] xen: Add xenbus " Bastian Blank
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] xen: Add xenbus_backend device Bastian Blank
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] xen/privcmd: Remove unused support for arch specific privcmp mmap Bastian Blank
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] xen/xenbus-frontend: Make error message more clear Bastian Blank
2011-12-12 9:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-12-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] xen/xenbus-backend: Only register device if communication ring is local Bastian Blank
2011-12-12 9:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-12-12 15:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-12-12 18:28 ` Bastian Blank
2011-12-14 19:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111212154227.GB21558@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=waldi@debian.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.