From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/omap: drm API update: make fops struct const
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:04:52 -0800
Message-ID: <20111213010452.GA31721@kroah.com>
References: <1323737384-3145-1-git-send-email-rob.clark@linaro.org>
	<1323737384-3145-2-git-send-email-rob.clark@linaro.org>
	<20111213005525.GA27225@kroah.com>
	<CAF6AEGvCek25j7YJb1XH_3jzz3BFFmL1ukFN5vRCK2n0EVPqeA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.26])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF079E860
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E4122B15
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:05:04 -0500 (EST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGvCek25j7YJb1XH_3jzz3BFFmL1ukFN5vRCK2n0EVPqeA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Rob Clark <rob.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, patches@linaro.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:59PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:49:43PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> From: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
> >>
> >> Update to reflect changes in:
> >> "Make the per-driver file_operations struct const"
> >
> > This one I could take today, no need for me to rely on the drm api
> > changes, right?
> 
> I don't think so, at least not if you want it to compile ;-)

Doh, you are right, sorry about that.

> Previously the 'struct file_operations' was inline with the 'struct
> drm_driver' rather than a pointer.  But if it it makes it easier for
> you to keep track I can keep a tree that you can pull from w/ a branch
> on top with the patches that depend on stuff coming in thru drm-next.

No, that would mix the two branches, and I can't do that, right?

So let's just wait for the drm-next branch to be merged with Linus, and
I'll hold onto these until then, ok?

thanks,

greg k-h