From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@qlogic.com>
Cc: "starlight@binnacle.cx" <starlight@binnacle.cx>,
Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel 3.1.1 message: <IRQ> warn_alloc_failed
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:41:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111213104152.14c01911@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13A253B3F9BEFE43B93C09CF75F63CAA8162593365@MNEXMB1.qlogic.org>
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:42:13 -0600
Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@qlogic.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> Stephan,
> Thanks for analyzing.
>
> Yes, the netxen adapter does not support fragmented page memory.
> They are not harmful messages. At that instant of time it may fail allocating
> memory for some buffers in the ring but after enough memory is available
> it will try to allocate memory for unallocated buffers in ring.
>
> Or the other option could be to turn LRO off.
>
> Rajesh
>
> ________________________________________
> From: starlight@binnacle.cx [starlight@binnacle.cx]
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:33 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger; Sony Chacko; Rajesh Borundia
> Cc: linux-kernel; netdev
> Subject: Re: kernel 3.1.1 message: <IRQ> warn_alloc_failed
>
> At 09:50 AM 12/9/2011 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:10:02 -0500 starlight@binnacle.cx wrote:
> >
> >You are seeing memory allocation failures because device
> >is allocating a 16K (order 2) size socket buffer. You are using
> >netxen device, and it looks like the problem.
> >
> >From reading the netxen driver source. The LRO buffers
> >in this device are very large (8060+skb overhead).
> >Until the driver is fixed to use fragmented page size memory,
> >I recommend turning off LRO.
>
> Thank you for the analysis. As an alternative
> would it make sense to double or quadruple
>
> /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes
>
> or perhaps do the same for
>
> /proc/slabinfo(size-16384)
>
The driver should be changed to call allocation with __GFP_NOWARN.
Change dev_alloc_skb(size) to
__dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN)
Or better yet, switch to using netdev_alloc variant like
__netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev, length, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 2:10 kernel 3.1.1 message: <IRQ> warn_alloc_failed starlight
2011-12-09 17:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <20111209095014.14a647cd@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net >
2011-12-09 18:03 ` starlight
2011-12-13 17:42 ` Rajesh Borundia
2011-12-13 18:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-12-13 19:09 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111213104152.14c01911@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajesh.borundia@qlogic.com \
--cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
--cc=starlight@binnacle.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.