All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio: Add wrapper functions around buffer access ops
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:31:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214143144.GL3503@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE87755.3000000@metafoo.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:15:49AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Marking the function as __must_check doesn't make much sense here. Since it
> will either return an error or the buffer length. So you'll always use the
> returned result one way or the other.

Isn't that the point of a __must_check?

This reminds me of when we added __must_check to ERR_PTR() and
PTR_ERR().  We found places that didn't check.

regards,
dan carpenter


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-14 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-12 10:08 [PATCH] staging:iio: Add wrapper functions around buffer access ops Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-13  0:45 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13  9:01   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-13 23:59     ` Greg KH
2011-12-14  7:19       ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-14 10:15       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-14 14:31         ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2011-12-14 15:05           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-14 16:42             ` Dan Carpenter
2011-12-14 15:49         ` Greg KH
2011-12-14 17:35           ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111214143144.GL3503@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.