From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: XFS/btrfs performance after IO-less dirty throttling
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:31:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214143156.GA22511@localhost> (raw)
Hi,
This very basic 1-disk performance comparison shows +8.3% overall
improvements for XFS and +6.2% for btrfs.
The thresh=1M cases see big "regressions", however that's due to much
more strictly executed global dirty limit. So not real problems.
The other big regressions happen in the XFS UKEY-thresh=100M cases.
Need to explore what's going on inside XFS...
wfg@bee /export/writeback% ./compare -g xfs fat/*/*-3.1.0+ fat/*/*-3.2.0-rc3
3.1.0+ 3.2.0-rc3
------------------------ ------------------------
43.24 +11.6% 48.26 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
51.35 +8.3% 55.62 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
58.73 +5.7% 62.09 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
4.17 -37.8% 2.59 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
4.14 -53.3% 1.94 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
6.30 +0.4% 6.33 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
8.88 +18.0% 10.48 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-1-3.1.0+
36.01 +25.2% 45.07 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-1-3.1.0+
47.04 +9.2% 51.38 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_rates-1-3.1.0+
38.23 +22.7% 46.92 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
45.17 +22.6% 55.39 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
51.66 +9.2% 56.44 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
38.31 +23.2% 47.18 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
43.60 +26.1% 54.99 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
50.14 +14.4% 57.39 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
38.06 +26.8% 48.26 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
42.43 +28.1% 54.34 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
50.30 +10.4% 55.53 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
28.89 -3.9% 27.76 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
44.94 +3.6% 46.54 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.60 -3.0% 53.95 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
37.05 -15.2% 31.43 fat/thresh=10M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.42 +1.1% 56.03 fat/thresh=10M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
41.64 -30.3% 29.00 fat/thresh=1M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
56.68 -4.5% 54.14 fat/thresh=1M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
977.98 +8.3% 1059.05 TOTAL write_bw
wfg@bee /export/writeback% ./compare -g btrfs fat/*/*-3.1.0+ fat/*/*-3.2.0-rc3
3.1.0+ 3.2.0-rc3
------------------------ ------------------------
53.49 +19.6% 63.98 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
56.50 +11.8% 63.19 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
60.07 +6.3% 63.83 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
4.81 +26.8% 6.10 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
5.00 +23.2% 6.16 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
5.99 +1.8% 6.10 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
15.98 -10.6% 14.29 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-1-3.1.0+
52.02 +5.4% 54.85 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-1-3.1.0+
56.01 +2.6% 57.48 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_rates-1-3.1.0+
52.42 +10.4% 57.85 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.75 +7.7% 57.86 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
53.23 +11.2% 59.18 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
55.11 +5.3% 58.02 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.01 +5.3% 55.83 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.71 +5.9% 58.97 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
54.07 +6.5% 57.61 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.05 +4.1% 55.21 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
54.79 +5.6% 57.85 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
56.42 +2.9% 58.06 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
57.41 +1.5% 58.26 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
58.12 +4.1% 60.50 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
44.41 +29.2% 57.37 fat/thresh=10M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
54.33 +9.3% 59.37 fat/thresh=10M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
5.00 -47.3% 2.64 fat/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
15.21 -83.6% 2.50 fat/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
1085.90 +6.2% 1153.08 TOTAL write_bw
It performs roughly the same with the pending writeback changes:
wfg@bee /export/writeback% ./compare -g xfs fat/*/*-3.1.0+ fat/*/*-3.2.0-rc3-pause6+
3.1.0+ 3.2.0-rc3-pause6+
------------------------ ------------------------
43.24 +9.2% 47.21 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
51.35 +8.9% 55.90 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
58.73 +5.8% 62.15 fat/UKEY-HDD/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
4.17 -33.1% 2.79 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
4.14 -23.9% 3.15 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
6.30 +0.2% 6.32 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
8.88 +10.2% 9.78 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-1-3.1.0+
36.01 +24.4% 44.80 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-1-3.1.0+
47.04 +11.9% 52.64 fat/fio/xfs-fio_fat_rates-1-3.1.0+
38.23 +27.9% 48.89 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
45.17 +21.0% 54.67 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
51.66 +11.2% 57.46 fat/thresh=1000M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
38.31 +15.1% 44.08 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
43.60 +24.8% 54.41 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
50.14 +13.4% 56.87 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
38.06 +28.9% 49.05 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
42.43 +28.3% 54.41 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
50.30 +8.1% 54.36 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
28.89 -1.2% 28.55 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
44.94 +5.3% 47.33 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.60 +3.4% 57.48 fat/thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
37.05 -14.5% 31.68 fat/thresh=10M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.42 +0.6% 55.77 fat/thresh=10M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
41.64 -30.8% 28.82 fat/thresh=1M/xfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
56.68 -3.0% 54.98 fat/thresh=1M/xfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
977.98 +8.7% 1063.55 TOTAL write_bw
wfg@bee /export/writeback% ./compare -g btrfs fat/*/*-{3.1.0+,3.2.0-rc3-pause6+}
3.1.0+ 3.2.0-rc3-pause6+
------------------------ ------------------------
53.49 +19.2% 63.75 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
56.50 +14.1% 64.49 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
60.07 +6.7% 64.11 fat/UKEY-HDD/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
4.81 +27.4% 6.12 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
5.00 +21.7% 6.09 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
5.99 +1.9% 6.11 fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
15.98 -8.5% 14.62 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-1-3.1.0+
52.02 +4.2% 54.20 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-1-3.1.0+
56.01 +1.0% 56.57 fat/fio/btrfs-fio_fat_rates-1-3.1.0+
52.42 +11.4% 58.38 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.75 +9.2% 58.67 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
53.23 +9.6% 58.34 fat/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
55.11 +5.8% 58.33 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.01 +6.8% 56.62 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
55.71 +3.8% 57.84 fat/thresh=1000M:990M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
54.07 +6.9% 57.78 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
53.05 +5.3% 55.87 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
54.79 +4.2% 57.09 fat/thresh=1000M:999M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
56.42 +2.7% 57.97 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.1.0+
57.41 +1.9% 58.51 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
58.12 +1.0% 58.71 fat/thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
44.41 +31.0% 58.16 fat/thresh=10M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
54.33 +7.9% 58.60 fat/thresh=10M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
5.00 -55.3% 2.24 fat/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.1.0+
15.21 -81.0% 2.89 fat/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.1.0+
1085.90 +6.1% 1152.06 TOTAL write_bw
Thanks,
Fengguang
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 14:31 Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-12-14 14:59 ` XFS/btrfs performance after IO-less dirty throttling Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111215133137.GA14562@localhost>
2011-12-16 0:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-16 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-16 4:25 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-16 5:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-19 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-19 5:44 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111215135250.GB14562@localhost>
2011-12-16 5:27 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111214143156.GA22511@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.