From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Buffers not reachable by PCI
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:12:24 -0500
Message-ID: <20111215161224.GB7272@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E184FA@USILMS110A.ca.com>
	<20111213232759.GA8702@konrad-lan>
	<3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E18564@USILMS110A.ca.com>
	<4EE8785A0200007800067A16@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E18A6B@USILMS110A.ca.com>
	<4EE8EDF5.5070800@ca.com> <20111215015944.GD10268@konrad-lan>
	<3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E18EBF@USILMS110A.ca.com>
	<20111215022938.GA16031@andromeda.dapyr.net>
	<3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E18ED1@USILMS110A.ca.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E243B26F475504B9BB0BCC9728B0DA629E18ED1@USILMS110A.ca.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Taylor, Neal E" <Neal.Taylor@ca.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Kalev,
	Leonid" <Leonid.Kalev@ca.com>, Tushar N Dave <tushar.n.dave@intel.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:40:32AM +0000, Taylor, Neal E wrote:
> Sure! But only if 3.0.4 is recent enough. However, that version does not have the code for the "free_bootmem" section of this patch so only the first line was actually tested. (Not that I could test the negative case if the code existed.)
> 
> I'll test on a more recent version (your pick) tomorrow, should you prefer.

Just as long as your modified code has this:

  alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes));

then that is great!

(The free_bootmem we can ignore for the 3.0.4 kernel).