From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "seabios@seabios.org" <seabios@seabios.org>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:19:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219191909.GB3425@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EEF7C53.6050800@codemonkey.ws>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:02:59PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 11:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >I hadn't raised it again, because I had mistakenly assumed QEMU
> >will automatically pull in the newer SeaBios release before 1.0
> >came out. I could have more aggresively bugged people on qemu-devel
> >to update SeaBios, but given your point above about not wanting to
> >rebase Seabios its not clear that would have helped sort this out
> >before 1.0
>
> We really need to update SeaBIOS whenever there is a bug that we
> know requires an update. Things breakdown because of one or more of
> the following reasons:
>
> 1) User submits a patch to seabios@, Kevin applies it. But that
> doesn't necessarily trigger anything happening in QEMU.
>
> Ideally, the above mentioned user would submit a submodule update once (1) happens.
>
> 2) Kevin fixes something on his own or someone else changes
> something in the broader SeaBIOS community. That may not even be
> visible in QEMU.
>
> Syncing right before release isn't a good strategy either because
> that means we're pulling in something that hasn't been tested
> extensively at the very tail end of our release cycle.
>
> I would like to point out that August -> October is a pretty long
> time period for a regression like this to exist. I think that
> really indicates that the primary problem is testing, not frequency
> of SeaBIOS updates.
One complication is that alot of us are not necessarily testing the
SeaBIOS that is in QEMU GIT. Fedora rawhide includes qemu-kvm.git
snapshots which are updated fairly frequently, but we don't use
the SeaBIOS QEMU includes. Instead Fedora includes the latest
SeaBIOS upstream release.
So Fedora 16/rawhide users would never have seen this particular
bug for longer than a couple of weeks until the fixed SeaBIOS
arrived.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-30 13:11 [Qemu-devel] qemu.git hangs booting Linux after insmod virtio_blk.ko Richard W.M. Jones
2011-09-30 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] git-bisect results (was: Re: qemu.git hangs booting Linux after insmod virtio_blk.ko) Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-16 22:19 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 0:07 ` [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 (was: Re: git-bisect results (was: Re: qemu.git hangs booting Linux after insmod virtio_blk.ko)) Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 0:26 ` Max Filippov
2011-12-17 0:53 ` Max Filippov
2011-12-17 1:44 ` [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 (was: Re: git-bisect results Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 8:33 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 15:13 ` [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 15:22 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 15:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 15:25 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 16:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 16:35 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 16:49 ` Kevin O'Connor
2011-12-17 17:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 17:30 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-19 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-12-19 17:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] " Fred .
2011-12-19 17:26 ` Fred .
2011-12-19 17:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 17:43 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-12-19 18:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 19:04 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-19 19:16 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-12-19 19:40 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-19 19:42 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-19 19:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 19:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2011-12-19 19:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-20 3:38 ` Kevin O'Connor
2011-12-20 8:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-17 13:16 ` [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 (was: Re: git-bisect results Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-17 1:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-17 1:43 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111219191909.GB3425@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=seabios@seabios.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.