From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: timo.teras@iki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-3.0.x regression with ipv4 routes having mtu
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:03:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220080341.GM6348@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111219.150903.108164273331779302.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:09:03PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> Actually, adding yet another ID is pointless.
>
> Just get rid of redirect_genid, and use net->ipv4.rt_genid for all of
> the necessary purposes.
I already thought about such a solution, but is this really save?
What if somebody adds/deletes/flushes routes? rt_cache_invalidate()
is invoked and we increment net->ipv4.rt_genid. Then an icmp redirect
may appear and we call ip_rt_redirect() which sets the id on the
inetpeer to the new value of net->ipv4.rt_genid. After that,
ipv4_validate_peer() will find the generation id in proper state
and does not invalidate the learned pmtu value.
I think we could either have two separate generation ids for
pmtu and redirect handling, or we could handle both cases together
by accumulating check_peer_redir() and check_peer_pmtu() into a
check_peer() function. But the latter seems to be a bit too extensive
for a simple bug fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 15:54 linux-3.0.x regression with ipv4 routes having mtu Timo Teräs
2011-12-14 17:50 ` David Miller
2011-12-14 17:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-14 18:22 ` Timo Teräs
2011-12-15 13:49 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-16 12:21 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-16 14:30 ` Timo Teräs
2011-12-19 13:52 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-19 20:09 ` David Miller
2011-12-20 8:03 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2011-12-19 21:10 ` David Miller
2011-12-20 6:53 ` Timo Teräs
2011-12-20 7:03 ` David Miller
2011-12-20 7:18 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-20 18:35 ` David Miller
2011-12-21 8:56 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-21 20:56 ` David Miller
2011-12-22 10:25 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-22 18:51 ` David Miller
2011-12-23 8:47 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-12-23 9:00 ` David Miller
2011-12-23 8:58 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-02-02 10:01 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111220080341.GM6348@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.