From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:02:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221190211.GE11842@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF23A1F.60803@xenotime.net>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20111216:
> >>
> >>
> >> (not new today, just not reported earlier)
> > John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now.
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next?
> It still fails today (linux-next 20111221).
>
>
> data.c:(.text+0x3e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> data.c:(.text+0x400): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> ntf.c:(.text+0xb60): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> ntf.c:(.text+0xb80): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> rsp.c:(.text+0x750): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> rsp.c:(.text+0x770): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> netlink.c:(.text+0x14e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> netlink.c:(.text+0x1500): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> af_nfc.c:(.text+0xe0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> af_nfc.c:(.text+0x100): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1000): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1020): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
I have this commit in wireless-next, been there a couple of days:
commit 645d35902c8f05a1b12fa838aa9052d8eeaf161e
Author: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Dec 16 15:03:36 2011 +0100
NFC: Fix LLCP related build failure
llcp_mac routines should be static and inlined or build will fail with NFC
selected without LLCP.
This patch fixes:
LD [M] net/nfc/nfc.o
net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
netlink.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
netlink.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
rawsock.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
rawsock.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 7:55 linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-19 20:32 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-19 20:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-19 20:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-19 20:38 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (staging/media/go7007) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-19 20:44 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-20 16:39 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-20 20:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-20 20:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 19:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 19:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 19:02 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2011-12-21 20:20 ` Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <4EF23A1F.60803-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-21 20:42 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-21 20:42 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-21 21:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 23:35 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-22 1:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-22 1:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 1:52 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 Mark Brown
2011-12-20 3:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 6:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 11:54 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111221190211.GE11842@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=samuel@sortiz.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.