All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>,
	Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dwg@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:04:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111222093447.GD26407@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221005502.GE5188@truffala.fritz.box>

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:55:02AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 04:53:30PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > While PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG ptrace flag in PowerPC accepts
> > PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT mode of breakpoint, the same is not intimated to the
> > user-space debuggers (like GDB) who may want to use it. Hence we introduce a
> > new PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_EXACT flag which will be populated on the
> > "features" member of "struct ppc_debug_info" to advertise support for the
> > same on Book3E PowerPC processors.
> 
> Hrm.  I had assumed the reason there wasn't a feature bit for EXACT
> originally was that EXACT breakpoints were *always* supposed to be
> supported by the new interface.
>

Okay. Although BookS doesn't support EXACT breakpoints, it is possible
(after the introduction of new hw-breakpoint interfaces) to request for
a breakpoint of length 1 Byte.

The hw-breakpoint infrastructure would take care of filtering the
extraneous interrupts arising out of accesses in the neighbourhood, in
such a case.

David,
	Can you Ack this patch too, if you find the changes acceptable?

Thanks,
K.Prasad
 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-08 11:12 [PATCH 0/2] Changes to PowerPC ptrace flags using watchpoints - v2 K.Prasad
2011-12-08 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags K.Prasad
2011-12-21  0:54   ` David Gibson
2011-12-08 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag K.Prasad
2011-12-21  0:55   ` David Gibson
2011-12-22  9:34     ` K.Prasad [this message]
2012-01-16  8:18       ` David Gibson
2012-02-15 22:18         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-19  7:45 [PATCH 0/2] Changes to PowerPC ptrace flags using watchpoints K.Prasad
2011-08-19  7:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag K.Prasad
2011-08-23  5:09   ` David Gibson
2011-08-23  9:27     ` K.Prasad
2011-08-24  4:00       ` David Gibson
2011-08-25  0:41         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-08-26  4:41           ` David Gibson
2011-08-31  0:27             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-09-19  1:10               ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111222093447.GD26407@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.