From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753811Ab1LVPgu (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:36:50 -0500 Received: from va3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.11]:56622 "EHLO VA3EHSOBE008.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752427Ab1LVPgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:36:48 -0500 X-SpamScore: -13 X-BigFish: VPS-13(zz1432N98dK4015Lzz1202hzzz2dh668h839h944h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.108;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp01.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-WSS-ID: 0LWM3D6-01-1UL-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:36:10 +0100 From: Robert Richter To: Ingo Molnar CC: Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stephane Eranian , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] perf, x86: Implement AMD IBS Message-ID: <20111222153610.GC16765@erda.amd.com> References: <1323968199-9326-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323968199-9326-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo, On 15.12.11 17:56:35, Robert Richter wrote: > Changes for V4 (only patch #3 modified): > > * removed userland implementation from patch set, will post it as > separate patch series > * fix returned number of handled nmis in perf_ibs_handle_irq() > Robert Richter (4): > perf, x86: Implement IBS event configuration > perf, x86: Implement IBS interrupt handler > perf, x86: Implement IBS pmu control ops > perf, x86: Implement 64 bit counter support for IBS > > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 5 + > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 + > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c | 438 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 438 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Assuming that there is agreement about the perf tool ibs implementation, could you consider to apply the (kernel) patches? Not sure what Arnaldo's plan is for the userland. It would be great to have both ready for 3.3. (Even if Peter is on vacation or so, except the fix in perf_ibs_handle_irq() the kernel patches are unchanged and Peter already agreed to apply them.) Thanks, -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center